Bidirectional Evacuation in Subway Fires Considering the Number of Retrograders and Proactive Avoidance Behavior Based on Experiments and Simulations

Abstract

Subway fires often cause significant casualties and property losses. There are some special bidirectional coupling scenarios during subway fires, such as firefighters moving against the evacuation flow to extinguish fires, emergency managers going to the fire scene to respond to emergencies, or other similar scenarios. How to evacuate passengers quickly and enable responders to enter the fire scene has become a big challenge for subway fire evacuation and response. The core goal is to reduce the degree of mutual interaction between these people moving in opposite directions. In this study, the impact of counterflow individuals and proactive avoidance behavior on evacuation processes was investigated through experiments and simulations. The Fire Dynamic Simulator was used to simulate the development of a fire scenario to determine the available safe egress time. Micro-evacuation experiments were conducted to obtain actual evacuation parameters, such as the speeds of different objects. With these parameters as input, a macro subway fire scenario was built to simulate the bidirectional evacuation process. Consistent conclusions were obtained from the experiments and evacuation simulations. The results indicate that the overall evacuation time increases with the number of retrograders. Proactive avoidance behavior can effectively reduce the travel time of counterflow individuals, but it causes slight delays for forward-moving evacuees. An optimization strategy was implemented through conductor guidance. All passengers can successfully evacuate under the optimization strategy, with a 25.3% improvement in overall evacuation time. This research provides some insights into the coordinated evacuation and emergency response during subway fires or similar scenarios.

 
Keywords: sasa asas sas dvme


References

Ragab, E. A., Dafallah, M. A., Salih, M. H., Osman, W. N., Osman, M., Miskeen, E., Taha, M. H., Ramadan, A., Ahmed, M., Abdalla, M. E., & Ahmed, M. H. (2021). Stress and its correlates among medical students in six medical colleges: an attempt to understand the current situation. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 28(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-021-00158-w

Rudland, J. R., Golding, C., & Wilkinson, T. J. (2020). The stress paradox: How stress can be good for learning. Medical Education, 54(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13830

Schimschal, S. E., Visentin, D., Kornhaber, R., & Cleary, M. (2021). Grit: A concept analysis. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 42(5), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1814913

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2022). Academic self-efficacy. In Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 268–282). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003013778-21

Shadi, M., Peyman, N., Taghipour, A., & Tehrani, H. (2018). Predictors of the academic stress and its determinants among students based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal Fundamentals of Mental Health, 20(1), 87–98. https://jfmh.mums.ac.ir/article_10060.html?lang=en

Siswanti, D. N., Daud, M., Nugraha, D. Y., Zhalifunnas, M. S., & Nugraha, D. R. (2024). The effect of workplace well-being on task performance in employees: The mediating role of work engagement. Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology (GamaJPP), 10(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajpp.90500

Sohail, N. (2013). Stress and academic performance among medical students. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, 23(1), 67–71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23286627

Stewart, S. B. (2015). Grit and self-control as predictors of first-year student success [Doctoral thesis]. University of Southern Maine.

Stockinger, K., Rinas, R., & Daumiller, M. (2021). Student adaptability, emotions, and achievement: Navigating new academic terrains in a global crisis. Learning and Individual Differences, 90, 102046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102046

Sulla, F., Aquino, A., & Rollo, D. (2022). University students’ online learning during COVID-19: The role of grit in academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825047

Sun, J., Dunne, M. P., Hou, X., & Xu, A. (2011). Educational stress scale for adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(6), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910394976

Travis, J., Kaszycki, A., Geden, M., & Bunde, J. (2020). Some stress is good stress: The challenge-hindrance framework, academic self-efficacy, and academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(8), 1632.

Verner-Filion, J., Schellenberg, B. J. I., Holding, A. C., & Koestner, R. (2020). Passion and grit in the pursuit of long-term personal goals in college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 83–84, 101939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101939

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons.

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4

Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Takahashi, K., Wilke, C., Woo, K., Yutani, H., Dunnington, D., & Brand, T. van den. (2023). RStudio ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics.

You, J. W. (2018). Testing the three-way interaction effect of academic stress, academic self-efficacy, and task value on persistence in learning among Korean college students. Higher Education, 76(5), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0255-0

Zhao, H., Li, Y., Wan, L., & Li, K. (2023). Grit and academic self-efficacy as serial mediation in the Relationship between growth mindset and academic delay of gratification: A cross-sectional study. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 3185–3198. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S421544